You have been redirected here from as we are merging our websites to provide you with a one-stop shop for all your investment research needs.

Get Started:To search for a security, type the name or ticker in the search box at the top of the page and select from the dropdown results.

Registered Hemscott users canlog in to Morningstarusing the same login details. Similarly, if you are a Hemscott Premium user, you now have a Morningstar Premium account which you can access using the same login details. contains data, news and research on shares and funds, unique commentary and independent Morningstar research on a broad range of investment products, and portfolio and asset allocation tools to help make better investing decisions.

Find out moreabout Morningstar and the website

Readour top tips for getting the most out of

Locateyour usual features on

Seea comprehensive list of features

Investment Analysis Platform for Fund Managers

What are the Alternatives to Absolute Return Funds?

After absolute return funds failed to protect investors in last years market downturn, many have suffered huge outflows as buyers look elsewhere for protection

Absolute return funds have gone from being a darling of the investment world to one of the most unloved sectors in the past 18 months, as some of the most overhyped strategies failed to deliver during a volatile 2018.

The Targeted Absolute Return sector has been the worst seller among retail investors in eight out of the 12 months to the end of September, according to Investment Association data. Over the course of 2018, it shed some 2.2bn. Much of this was the result of poor performance, with the average fund in the sector down 2.2%, according to Chelsea Financial Services.

Some of the worst affected funds in the group were the highest profile multi-strategy vehicles that promised real diversification benefits but failed to achieve their objectives: the Neutral-RatedASI Global Absolute Return Strategy, commonly known as GARS; Neutral-RatedInvesco Global Targeted ReturnsandAviva Multi-Strategy Targeted Return.

During 2018, Avivas fund was down 6.1%, GARS fell 6.4% and Invescos fund closed the year 3.8% lower. All three underperformed the sector over three and five years, but it seems 2018 wasthe final straw for investorswho were hoping to gain protection from stock market falls.

Consequently, all three funds have shed assets over the past 18 months. The ASI Global Absolute Return Strategy bore the brunt of the outflows, losing more than two thirds of its value with an eye-watering 12.5 billion of outflows over 18 months to the end of October, according to Morningstar data. The size of the UK-domiciled portion of the fund is now just 6.1 billion, down from a peak of close to 18 billion.

Its biggest competitors from Aviva and Invesco have also seen assets dwindle. Aviva saw total outflows of more than 3 billion from its UK and Luxembourg-domiciled vehicles, with total assets in the strategy at 5.8 billion, while Invescos vehicle has shed 2.4 billion over the same period to stand at 9.9 billion.

Darius McDermott, managing director at Chelsea Financial Services, says: GARS really made its name in 2008, when global markets were down 40%, the UK was down 30%, but it was nearly positive.

For a decent period of time, GARS was delivering and thats why it raised as much money as it did, and why Invesco and Aviva launched me-too products. But GARS hasnt been on our buy list for a good few years. When it started to get too big and get negative returns we got out.

The disappointing performance of the strategies over a rolling three-year period is just one of the reasons investors are ditching multi-strategy absolute return funds. The other related issue is the lack of diversification benefits these vehicles provide. For example, the correlation of GARS to the MSCI AC World index is 0.6, not negative as one might expect, McDermott says (a correlation of 1.0 shows two assets move perfectly in sync, 0 indicates no correlation, while -0.1 shows they move in opposite directions).

And finally, as Ben Yearsley, director at Shore Financial Planning, puts it: Many of these funds have tried to be too clever and too complicated. This has put off investors unable to understand the sources of return in these strategies.

Daniel Elkington, chartered financial planner at MT Financial Management, began selling out of targeted absolute return funds following the EU referendum in June 2016, having noticed that his own portfolios performed better than the majority of absolute return funds during this volatile period.

That is the sort of event when targeted absolute return funds should have done really well, but none of them did very well at all, he says.Another problem is when you are holding something like a long/short equity strategy, you are effectively buying 50% equity, 50% cash and paying a lot more for it.

Instead, Elkington has replaced the absolute return holdings with what he considers genuine alternative asset classes, such as property, gold and oil, which he says has worked well so far. These asset classes tend to offer a similar return to equities, but at different times in the cycle.

One fund he has chosen for this task is theTM Home Investorfund run by Hearthstone Investments, which invests in residential property. Elkington says the fund is fairly boring and vanilla but offers genuine diversification to bonds and equities.

Yearsley says the choice of a replacement fund for a GARS-type product depends on what characteristics investors want from it. A number of funds offer defensive characteristics and steady growth without the complicated nature of a GARS-style fund.

One such product isArchitas Diversified Real Assets, co-managed by Solomon Nevins and Mayank Markanday. All the holdings are long-only and it invests in real things such as renewable energy, gold or other asset-backed investments, Yearsley explains.

Another fund to look at isTime Defensive Income Securities- a relatively new fund that invests in the listed renewables and infrastructure space and looks to deliver around a 5% income plus modest capital growth over time, he adds.

However, McDermott is sticking with some products from the Targeted Absolute Return sector, including the Morningstar Neutral-ratedJupiter Absolute Returnfund, run by James Clunie, andMerian Global Equity Absolute Return, both of which have negative correlation to the MSCI AC World index. Others include theSVS Church House Tenax Absolute Return StrategiesandTwentyFour Absolute Return Creditfunds.

While McDermott thinks the overall performance of these funds has been disappointing, he points out that some of the strategies really came into play in Q4 last year. When markets were suffering, they did defend and reminded us why we owned them.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a persons sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Morningstar data shows that investors poured three times as much money into bonds in August th…

Investors continue to flee equities in favour of fixed income, and UK and property funds remai…

Nervous investors feeling spooked by market volatility may want to look for funds with defensi…

Weve wrapped up some of the most interesting and witty quotes given by fund managers in our 5 M…

Nick Trains Lindsell Train UK Equity fund and Finsbury Growth Trust have been downgraded by Morn…

UPDATED DECEMBER 2019: Imperial Tobacco remains at the top of the list for the end of the year, b…

Funds focused on China, the US and technology outperformed in the first quarter of 2019, while an…

SPECIAL REPORT: At this years Morningstar Investment Conference a range of experts gave their vi…

THE INCOME INVESTOR: The largest companies in the UK source their revenues internationally, meani…

Want to secure a sustainable source of income and returns? Look beneath the hood of your fund hol…

Weve wrapped up some of the most interesting and witty quotes given by fund managers in our 5 M…

Nick Trains Lindsell Train UK Equity fund and Finsbury Growth Trust have been downgraded by Morn…

VIDEO: After the presents have been opened and the mince pies eaten, investors may want to use th…

Equity funds saw net inflows in November for the first time in a year, as investors turned risk-o…

This week we talk with Jon Foster about the importance of investing in environmental projects, th…

Anna FedorovaAnna Fedorova is a freelance journalist writing on investment and personal finance

Morningstar is partly funded by advertising. This helps us pay for the great content, data and tools we provide to all investors. In order to make the advertising relevant to our users we need to understand whether you are an individual investor or financial professional.

I am able to make investment purchases in the United Kingdom

By clicking accept I acknowledge that this website uses cookies and other technologies to tailor my experience and understand how I and other visitors use our site. See Cookie Consent for more detail.

© Copyright 2019 Morningstar.All rights reserved.

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analysts estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analysts estimate of a stocks fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firms economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stocks fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isnt. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visithere

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstars estimate of the per share dollar amount that a companys equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstars equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visithere

Please continue to support Morningstar by adding us to your whitelist or disabling your ad blocker while visiting oursite.No ThanksIve disabled itAd blocker detected.

Unfortunately, we detect that your ad blocker is still running.To access our site, simply turn off your ad blocker and press Ive disabled it to continue.